Passport to Live

Have you ever been part of a Go/No Go decision for an important implementation where the decision is Go, but there are many fingers crossed behind the scenes? Have you experienced a last-minute realisation that the helpdesk wasn’t informed? Or found that while everything was technically perfect, the operational unit affected was off on a training course?
I’m sure there are lots more examples of ‘when launch goes bad’. It’s so easy to happen and devastating for those who have worked so hard to get their part done. In my experience there is rarely malicious or deliberate intent. There is just so much going on that it’s easy not to have covered all the angles. Let’s face it, comprehensive implementations are still not an everyday occurrence for many organisations. 
Even if you go on holiday 3 or 4 times a year, you still go through your checklist to make sure you don’t turn up to the airport without your passport… 

Passport to Live

That’s what I call it. How do you give your stakeholders the confidence to say yes for a Go Decision. It’s my term for business and technical readiness, release management, Go/No Go, project readiness review, gate review, I’m sure there are many other terms used. I like the term ‘Passport to Live’, it’s a simple metaphor for people to understand that to get to the required destination successfully and safely, FOR ALL, there are some checks and validations that need to be met. The reason I capitalised ‘for all’ is that this is not just about making sure the product (or service) is ready, but also to ensure that the environment in which the product lands is not adversely disrupted. Think about those items that you can’t take to some countries to protect the ecosystem. Passport to Live is about engaging all participants.


So how does Passport to Live (P2L) work?


Here are the golden principles for a successful Passport to Live process:


1.     Early Start:

Start the process as early as possible into your project. For me, preparing for the launch happens in parallel to creating the product. By doing this you are mitigating risk from the beginning and keeping your eye on the end goal.


2.     Clear Accountability:

The overall P2L process is managed by a dedicated facilitator, while the specific activities within it are owned and managed by designated individuals.


3.     No Surprises:

Prepare your decision-maker/s along the path. The first time that they look at the passport should never be at the point of making the decision. The whole point of P2L is to provide confidence and to make the final decision simple and firm.


The general premise of P2L is that there are 6-8 focussed, headline questions or checks that need to be answered to enable the Go (or No Go) decision. Below is a starter list that you can tailor for your own needs.

These questions ensure comprehensive coverage of technical, compliance, and operational aspects.

The idea is that if you have the affirmative answers to these questions, with the appropriate provenances, you should have the confidence to stamp the passport and to go through the gate.


Confidence is the key word here. The overall accountable person need to be certain that, within an agreed level of risk, they are giving a safe go decision. Passport to Live provides the assurance that all the critical points have been addressed in a comprehensive and controlled manner.


Let’s return to those questions, because let’s face it, they are both simple and complex. To be able to say ‘yes’ to each question, there are likely several components that need to be answered. 

For each of these sub questions, there should be a link to the appropriate evidence, like a Test Completion Report, for example.


Distributed Accountability


‘Thorough scrutiny and collective responsibility’


The final decision to ‘Go Live’ is taken by the assigned governing body, relying on the assurances provided by the owners of each check.


For example, the Project Board relies on the Test Manager who reviews the output from the testing team/documentation and reports on the results.


What we see now is a clear path;


 ‘Yes, we can go live

Because all the core checks have been passed

Which includes that the product is fit for purpose

As all the testing checks have been satisfactorily completed.

 And here’s the evidence to prove it.’


By setting up the P2L process early, you have provided yourself with a great way of checking progress addressing blockers, and limiting surprises just before you go live. If you add updates and RAG on progress for each of the elements in your P2L, you’ve got yourself some great instant reporting and a central collaboration point. Set up regular check-ins for the project team, introduce the P2L dashboard to your governing body as a standard agenda item and perhaps provide a clear escalation path. Have a standard P2L template; these are all ways that you can embed this process and make it ‘business as usual’.

As a project/programme manager you are helping your stakeholders to feel confident about progress and allowing them to focus on where their help is required. You are ensuring that go decisions are based on the whole picture. You are confirming that your passport is up to date and in good health to go through the boarding gate.


Benefits


  • Early P2L implementation allows for early risk identification and mitigation, reducing last-minute surprises.
  • The process provides structured reporting and central collaboration, aiding stakeholders in focusing their efforts effectively.
  • At the portfolio level, consistent P2L practices help balance release schedules and implement improvements efficiently.


So, there you have it, my model for making a confident Go/No Go decision. I’ve used it in several organisations now, sometimes it’s called something different, the formatting changes but the principles remain the same.  It’s been used by me and adopted by others with success. What I have witnessed every time the P2L is used is a calm and confident decision being made at the Go/No Go gate. Just don’t forget to apply the principles!


Remember, this is a process, not a last-minute check. It consolidates all the activities required for a confident Go decision. While one person facilitates the P2L process, the accountability and responsibility lie with all component teams and individuals.


Now grab your passport and fly!

by Zoe O'Toole 8 September 2025
A Safe Harbour for Work That Matters Over the past few months on the Norfolk coast, and exploring the Broads, boats have been a constant part of my view — moored, passing, gliding by. Back in Northamptonshire, there were no waves or tides, but we did have canals — another ecosystem with its own slower rhythm, narrowboats with their routines, and a way of life that seems to move at walking pace. Soon we’ll be in Scotland, close to the wide Forth estuary — tidal, busy, and full of energy. It’s a very different stretch of water to Norfolk’s quiet channels, and it’s had me thinking about how PMO also has to work differently depending on its setting. The Harbour Picture Picture a harbour at dawn. Fishing boats head out early, ferries prepare for their first passengers, yachts wait for the right wind. Each boat has a different job, a different pace, and each one is essential to the harbour’s purpose. PMO works in the same way. It runs through portfolio, programme, and project work, and each plays its part when set up for what’s needed. Together, they keep delivery moving in the right direction. The Three Ps: Portfolio, Programme, Project Think of it like the harbour: Portfolio PMO: The Harbour Master Sets direction and decides which boats head out and when. Programme PMO: The Ferries and Trawlers Keeps the routes open, brings results back to port, and makes sure the harbour stays productive. Project PMO: The Small Boats and Crew Handles the day-to-day, checks the kit, keeps the logs, navigates the details, and gets close to the action. Each one plays a role in keeping the harbour working as a whole. Making It Work A small boat doesn’t need a full crew. A ferry doesn’t need a trawler’s nets. A harbour doesn’t need a fleet pulling apart. PMO is the same. Project PMO supports delivery. Programme PMO keeps routes clear. Portfolio PMO sets direction. The value doesn’t come from one level trying to be something it’s not — but from each doing the work that matters. Avoiding the Trap Sometimes project-level PMO is dismissed as “just admin.” Sometimes every PMO is pushed to look strategic, even when that isn’t what’s needed. True PMO maturity isn’t about piling on process or having the flashiest title. It’s about purpose — providing the right support, in the right place, at the right time. A Safe Harbour for Work That Matters A good harbour doesn’t just have big ships or shiny yachts. It has the right mix of vessels, ready for the day’s work. That is what PMO is for me: a safe harbour for work that matters — where strategy is shaped, programmes flow, and projects deliver with confidence. From Canals to Coastlines As we head north to Scotland, I know the boats will catch my eye again. Whether it’s a canal, a harbour, or the open sea, the message stays the same: PMO works best when ready for the journey ahead — helping every boat play its part in work that truly matters. Because when the harbour is well run, every boat gets where it needs to go. That’s when the strategy moves forward, the programmes flow, and the projects deliver without being swamped by the tide. Wishing you safe travels in your own waterways ...and if you’re looking to steady your harbour or set a new course, let’s talk.
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
If governance feels like a burden, it’s probably broken. It shouldn’t be a tick-box exercise or a blocker. Good governance brings confidence, clarity and calm. It helps teams focus on what matters, surface problems early, and make better decisions. It enables delivery. It protects value. It creates space for people to do their best work, not get buried in process. It’s not about slowing things down. It’s how we make sure the right things move forward. A good PMO knows this. It’s not the enemy of delivery; it’s your best friend
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
We expect every project to justify itself with a business case… but when did the PMO last write one? We challenge delivery teams all the time: 💡 What’s the benefit? 💷 Is it worth the investment? 📏 How will you measure success? But the PMO? We quietly set up, get stuck in, and rarely ask the same questions of ourselves. We know we’re valuable but have we ever taken the time to explain why, in the same language we ask of others? If your PMO had to write a business case today… what would be in it?
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
Lately I’ve noticed a trend. More and more PMO roles are asking for specific industry knowledge. It’s made me pause and think about what organisations are really looking for. I’ve worked in higher education, financial services, insurance, the public sector, manufacturing and retail to name a few. Each sector has its quirks, but what a good PMO delivers is clarity, confidence and momentum. A good PMO brings structure, insight and the right level of control to make things happen. Not get in the way. We help people make better decisions, focus on what matters and move forward with purpose. Crucially, a strong PMO knows how to flex. We don’t apply a one-size-fits-all model. We bring expertise that can be shaped to suit culture, ways of working and appetite for risk. That’s where the real value lies. I don’t need to be an expert in your industry to make a meaningful difference. Part of the role is quickly understanding how the organisation operates. Then applying what works best. Of course, there are exceptions. But in most cases, being industry agnostic is a strength. It brings fresh thinking, challenge and a broader view. I actively seek new sectors for exactly that reason. Is this push for industry experience part of the buyer’s market we’re in? Possibly. It could also be a missed opportunity to do things differently. Are we too focused on industry experience in PMO hiring? When PMO roles ask for sector-specific experience, I get it. It can feel like a safer choice. Someone who knows the environment, the challenges, the language. But I keep wondering what we might be missing. There’s often an assumption that industry experience makes someone a safer pair of hands. That they’ll already get the systems, the acronyms, the unwritten rules. In fast-moving or complex environments, it can feel like one less thing to explain. A good PMO isn’t there to run the business. We’re here to make change happen. We bring structure, clarity and focus. We help teams prioritise. We support better decisions. We spot risks early. We connect the dots and keep delivery moving. These are skills that cut across industries. In fact, stepping into a new sector often sharpens our ability to ask better questions and notice what others may have stopped seeing. Hiring someone with the same background might feel like the obvious choice. Someone with fresh perspective and a wider lens can often help you move forward faster.
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
For this week I am going to share some of my own case studies. 1️⃣ The Visibility Crisis Drowning in Projects? Here’s How We Took Back Control
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
On International Women’s Day, I continue to celebrate the woman who inspires me every single day: my daughter. She isn’t fearless, but she faces her fears with quiet determination. She has doubts, but she stands firm in her values. She is stronger than she realises, resolute in ways that amaze me. She’s studying film production and looks to build her future in cinematography: a field where women remain underrepresented. With her talent, determination, and unwavering passion, I have no doubt she will make her mark. She is my role model, and I couldn’t be more proud. #IWD #Inspiration #StrongWomen #FutureCinematographer
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
by Zoe O'Toole 21 August 2025
When people hear the word GOVERNANCE in project management, it often brings to mind rigid processes and endless forms. For many organisations, governance is seen as something that satisfies audit requirements but gets in the way of delivery. But does governance really have to be that way? Absolutely not. When done right, governance becomes a crucial part of successful delivery. And both PMOs and project managers share responsibility in ensuring it works effectively without becoming a burden. Governance: A Mindset Shift Too often, I’ve seen organisations where governance is implemented only to cover audits, but with an attitude that it shouldn’t “slow down” delivery. This reflects a deeper misconception that governance is a necessary evil; something to work around. What’s needed is a shift in mindset, especially at the leadership level. This isn’t about choosing between governance and delivery. When embedded correctly, it supports delivery seamlessly, rather than hindering it.